Credit match.
Your last invoice, matched in full. And our pricing is lower, so the same money goes further here.
TinyFish returns 90% usable content per page. Firecrawl returns 62%. Tavily returns 77%. Switch now and save up to 30%.
Trusted by
Fill in the form and tell us which tool you pay for. We ask for your latest invoice by email. We match it in wallet credits, dollar for dollar. Offer ends October 16.
Invoices under $200 a month get wallet credits within one business day. Everyone else gets a call with our team within two business days.
October 16, 2026
Your last invoice, matched in full. And our pricing is lower, so the same money goes further here.
Keep your current tool running while you decide. Sign up, fill in the form, send us your invoice when we ask, and the credits land in your wallet.
The match costs nothing to claim. And when it runs out, Search and Fetch stay free.
You've paid the year. We get it. Take a month at full scale on us, then let's talk about the rest.
| Capability | TinyFish | Firecrawl | Tavily | Exa | Parallel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median signal ratio | 90.5% | 61.7% | 77.2% | 89.7% | 76.3% |
| Fetch coverage | 93% | 62% | 80% | 73% | 58% |
| Top-result accuracy | 49.2% | 38.4% | 45.6% | 38.4% | 43.6% |
| Search p50 latency | 556 ms | 869 ms | 1,109 ms | 811 ms | 1,709 ms |
| Search API | Free | Credit-based | ~$8 per 1K credits | $7 per 1K | $1 to $5 per 1K |
| Fetch API | Free | Credit-based | ~$8 per 1K credits | $1 per 1K | $1 per 1K |
| Web Agent | Available | Interact | — | Beta | — |
| Stealth Browser | Available | — | — | — | — |
| Credential Vault | Available | — | — | — | — |
Same inputs, every tool, scored the same way.
See each comparison in full: TinyFish vs FirecrawlTinyFish vs TavilyTinyFish vs ExaTinyFish vs Parallel
Every number on this page comes from a reproducible test. Same inputs, every provider, scored the same way.
We ran 250 questions from OpenAI's SimpleQA benchmark and checked whether the first result was correct, and whether the top ten answered the question at all.
We timed 1,200 production search queries and compared typical speed, worst-case speed, and how many requests failed.
We fetched the same 45 URLs, everyday pages and major news sites, with both tools and measured how much usable content came back.
Everything your agent fetches goes straight into its context window. Cleaner pages mean fewer wasted tokens and better inputs for the model.
TinyFish delivers 90% content. Firecrawl delivers 62%. Tavily delivers 77%.
The same benchmark inputs show stronger first-result accuracy and the fastest median response.
The tools you use today stop at search and extract. TinyFish was built for everything that comes after reading a page.
Navigates across pages, fills forms, logs in through auth walls, and returns structured JSON. Scores 89.9% on Mind2Web.
Full browser control with anti-bot protection built into the engine itself, not spoofed headers.
Your agent gets through gated content without your passwords ever being exposed.
| TinyFish | Firecrawl | Tavily | Exa | Parallel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search | Free | Credit-based | Per credit | Per request | Per request |
| Fetch | Free | Credit-based | Per credit | Per page | Per request |
| Web Agent | $0.016 per stepLLM included | — | — | — | — |
| Stealth Browser | $0.002 per min | — | — | — | — |
| Free tier | $8 in Wallet funds plus free Search and Fetch | 1,000 pages | 1,000 credits/month | $10 free credits | Up to 16,000 requests |
Most of what an agent does is search and fetch. On TinyFish, both are free.
Someone on your team wrote the glue code that stitches your vendors together. Maintaining it is now part of their job, and that job never ends.
Your spend sits in one dashboard, your failures in another, your volume in a third. Three tabs across three companies, and no single picture of what your stack is actually doing.
we hit our limit mid month and firecrawl auto upgraded us to the next plan. nobody clicked anything, the bill just went up
we ended up building our own router to juggle vendors and now maintaining it is basically someone’s part time job
I have three dashboards open just to see what we spent, what failed, and how much we ran. three tabs, three companies
Search, fetch, browser, and agents on one key, one credit pool, one dashboard. You still decide which tool handles what. That call was always yours.
Multiple invoices. One of them you can’t predict.
One invoice. One number you already know.
For most teams the move is quick and easy. If you’re worried about older functionality or bandwidth, we put an engineer on your account until you’re live.
Firecrawl, Tavily, Exa and Parallel. Fill in the form, send us your latest invoice when we ask, and we match it in TinyFish wallet credits, dollar for dollar, until October 16.
Fill in the form. We email you for your invoice. Invoices under $200 a month get wallet credits within one business day. Larger invoices get a call with our team within two business days.
Yes. If you still pay for Firecrawl, Tavily, Exa or Parallel alongside TinyFish, fill in the form, send that invoice when we ask, and we match it in wallet credits.
We use your invoice only to check the amount and set up your credit match. It is stored in our CRM and nowhere else. Our privacy policy has the details.
On a 45-URL benchmark, TinyFish returned usable content on 42 pages with 90.5% usable content per page. Firecrawl reached 28 pages at 61.7%, Tavily 36 at 77.2%, Exa 33 at 89.7%, Parallel 26 at 76.3%.
On 250 SimpleQA questions, TinyFish's first result was correct 49.2% of the time. Firecrawl 38.4%, Tavily 45.6%, Exa 38.4%, Parallel 43.6%. TinyFish was the fastest at 556 ms median.
Search and Fetch are free on TinyFish at any volume. Every other tool on this page charges for both.