TinyFishvsTavily

TinyFish is faster and more accurate. Tavily stops at search and extract.

TinyFish delivers more accurate search, cleaner extractions, and broader coverage. Search and Fetch are free.

Trusted by
GoogleDoorDashAmazon
Capabilities

How they compare.

TinyFishHead to headTavily
Top-result accuracy
TinyFish
49.2%
Tavily
45.6%
Search p50 latency
TinyFish
556 ms
Tavily
1,109 ms
Fetch coverage
TinyFish
93%
Tavily
80%
News publishers
TinyFish
15/15
Tavily
12/15
Capability
TinyFish
Tavily
Search API
Free
Paid
Fetch API
Free
Paid
Web Agent
Available
Stealth Browser
Available
Credential Vault
Available
Failed requests
$0
How we tested

Benchmarks, not adjectives.

Every number on this page comes from a reproducible test. Same inputs, every provider, scored the same way.

01

Search quality

A 250-question sample from OpenAI SimpleQA measured first-result correctness and end-to-end answer rate over the top 10 results.

02

Production latency

A 1,200-query latency sample compared p50, p99, worst-case timing, and request errors for synchronous search calls.

03

Fetch coverage

A 45-URL benchmark across common web pages and major news publishers measured usable content coverage and content-to-noise signal.

Search

TinyFish search is faster and more accurate than Tavily.

TinyFish's first result answers the question correctly more often. Over thousands of agent calls, that gap compounds into fewer retries, fewer hallucinations, and faster task completion.

SimpleQA · 250 questions
Top-result accuracy · Snippet@1
TinyFish
49.2%
Tavily
45.6%
+3.6 ptsTinyFish's first result is right more often: 49.2% vs 45.6%.
SimpleQA · 250 questions
End-to-end answer rate · E2E@10
TinyFish
86.8%
Tavily
80.8%
+6.0 ptsTinyFish answers 86.8% end-to-end vs 80.8%.
1,200-query production latency sample · lower is better
p50 latency
TinyFish
556 ms
Tavily
1,109 ms
p99 latency
TinyFish
1,347 ms
Tavily
2,548 ms
2x faster2x faster at every percentile. A 5-step search loop completes in about 2.8s on TinyFish vs about 5.5s on Tavily.
Fetch

TinyFish fetch returns cleaner content than Tavily.

When your agent fetches a page, every character goes into your LLM's context window. Noisy extractions cost you twice: you pay more tokens, and your agent's answers get worse because the LLM reasons over navigation bars and ad placeholders instead of actual content.

TinyFish coverage
93%
42 / 45 URLs returned usable content
+13 points
Tavily coverage
80%
36 / 45 URLs · fails on 9
Median signal ratio · 45-URL benchmark

TinyFish returns 90% content, 10% noise. Tavily returns 77% content, 23% noise. That 23% is not free: it inflates token costs and dilutes the context your agent reasons over.

TinyFish
90.5%
vs
Tavily
77.2%

TinyFish reaches all 15.

Across 15 news articles from five major publishers, TinyFish reaches all 15. Tavily fails on 3.

TinyFish15/15
Tavily12/15
The full stack

TinyFish continues beyond Tavily search and fetch.

Most web APIs stop at search and extract: find a page, read it. Production agents hit login walls, dynamic forms, anti-bot challenges, and multi-page workflows. Tavily does not have an answer for these. TinyFish does.

Web Agent

Navigates pages autonomously, fills forms, authenticates, and returns structured JSON. 89.9% on Mind2Web.

✓ TinyFishTavily: Not available

Stealth Browser

Raw CDP control with engine-level fingerprint management and sub-250ms cold starts. Not header spoofing: actual browser-level stealth.

✓ TinyFishTavily: Not available

Credential Vault

Stores logins so your agent accesses authenticated content without exposing passwords.

✓ TinyFishTavily: Not available

This is what built for agents from the ground up means. Search and fetch are the starting point, not the ceiling.

Pricing

Search and Fetch are free.

 
TinyFish
Tavily
Search
Free
~$8 / 1K credits
Fetch
Free
~$8 / 1K credits
Web Agent
$0.015 / stepLLM included
Stealth Browser
$0.015 / 4 min
Free tier
500 credits + unlimited Search & Fetch
1,000 credits/month
Failed requests
$0
Credit consumed

At 10K searches + 10K fetches per month, the bill speaks for itself.

TinyFish / mo
$0
vs
Tavily / mo
~$160
FAQ

Common questions.

On a 250-question sample from OpenAI's SimpleQA benchmark, TinyFish's first result contains the correct answer 49.2% of the time vs Tavily's 45.6%. Over the top 10 results, TinyFish answers 86.8% of questions correctly vs 80.8%.

Across 1,200 production queries tested in parallel, TinyFish is 2x faster at every percentile: 556ms vs 1,109ms at p50, 1,347ms vs 2,548ms at p99.

TinyFish returns 90.5% content and 10% noise. Tavily returns 77.2% content and 23% noise. On a 45-URL benchmark, TinyFish extracts usable content from 42/45 pages vs Tavily's 36/45.

No. Tavily covers search and extract. TinyFish adds a Web Agent for multi-page navigation and form filling, a Stealth Browser with engine-level anti-bot protection, and a Credential Vault for authenticated content access.

TinyFish Search and Fetch are free. Tavily charges about $8 per 1,000 credits for both. At 10,000 searches + 10,000 fetches per month, TinyFish costs $0. Tavily costs about $160.

Yes. TinyFish works through REST API, SDKs, MCP, CLI, and Skill, and integrates with LangChain, Google ADK, n8n, Dify, and other popular agent platforms.

Built for the full agent workflow.

Start freeTalk to sales