Benchmarks
Measured against the best alternative, every time.
| Leader vs. Runner up | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| BrowseComp agentic research Average Search + Fetch latency | TinyFish1.47svsExa1.59s | 1.1× faster | Expand BrowseComp agentic research |
| TinyFish Fetch Quality Eval Pages returned as usable context | TinyFish93%vsTavily80% | 13.0 pts ahead | Expand TinyFish Fetch Quality Eval |
| Online-Mind2Web Success rate | TinyFish89.9%vsGemini 2.5 Computer Use69.0% | 20.9 pts ahead | Expand Online-Mind2Web |
| Search latency p50 Search latency | TinyFish556msvsExa811ms | 1.5× faster | Expand Search latency |
| SimpleQA First result contains enough evidence to answer | TinyFish49.2%vsTavily45.6% | 3.6 pts ahead | Expand SimpleQA |
| WebVoyager Task pass rate | TinyFish91.1%vsBrowserUse88.3% | 2.8 pts ahead | Expand WebVoyager |
| SimpleQA, end-to-end Questions answerable after Search + Fetch | TinyFish86.8%tiedParallel86.8% | Tied | Expand SimpleQA, end-to-end |
| BrowseComp agentic research Tasks completed without timeout or error | Firecrawl96/100vsTinyFish95/100 | 1 pt behind | Expand BrowseComp agentic research |
Last updated Jul 2026 · all axes start at zero · margins measured against the strongest comparator
Give agents cleaner contact
with the live web.
Fresh sources from Search, clean context from Fetch, completed tasks from Web Agent.
No credit card required