TinyFishvsParallel

TinyFish is the full stack. Parallel stops at search and extract.

TinyFish searches 3x faster, covers 93% of the web vs 58%, and acts on pages. Search and Fetch are free.

Trusted by
GoogleDoorDashAmazon
Capabilities

How they compare.

TinyFishHead to headParallel
Search p50 latency
TinyFish
556 ms
Parallel
1,709 ms
Fetch coverage
TinyFish
93%
Parallel
58%
News publishers
TinyFish
15/15
Parallel
0/15
Top-result accuracy
TinyFish
49.2%
Parallel
43.6%
Capability
TinyFish
Parallel
Search API
Free
$5/1K
Fetch API
Free
$1/1K
Web Agent
Available
Stealth Browser
Available
Credential Vault
Available
Failed requests
$0
How we tested

Benchmarks, not adjectives.

Every number on this page comes from a reproducible test. Same inputs, every provider, scored the same way.

01

Search quality

A 250-question sample from OpenAI SimpleQA measured first-result correctness and end-to-end answer rate over the top 10 results.

02

Production latency

A 1,200-query latency sample compared p50, p99, worst-case timing, and request errors for synchronous search calls.

03

Fetch coverage

A 45-URL benchmark across common web pages and major news publishers measured usable content coverage and content-to-noise signal.

Search

TinyFish search is faster than Parallel.

3x faster at p50, 4x faster at p99. Parallel's worst-case query takes nearly 12 seconds. In agent loops where search is synchronous, the tail latency becomes the user's experience.

1,200-query production latency sample · lower is better
p50 latency
TinyFish
556 ms
Parallel
1,709 ms
3x fasterTinyFish at 556 ms vs Parallel's 1,709 ms median.
p99 latency
TinyFish
1,347 ms
Parallel
5,571 ms
4x fasterAt the tail, TinyFish is 4x faster: 1,347 ms vs 5,571 ms.
Worst case2,661 ms11,812 ms
Errors01
SimpleQA · 250 questions
Top-result accuracy · Snippet@1
TinyFish
49.2%
Parallel
43.6%
+5.6 ptsTinyFish returns the right answer on the first result more often.
SimpleQA · 250 questions
End-to-end answer rate · E2E@10
TinyFish
86.8%
Parallel
86.8%
TiedE2E is tied when reading all 10 results.
Fetch

TinyFish fetch covers more live pages than Parallel.

Parallel's extract API works well for developer docs, repos, and pricing pages. On news publishers, it does not. In our 45-URL benchmark, every news URL came back as exactly 600 characters of truncated content, with the API reporting success.

TinyFish coverage
93%
42 / 45 URLs returned usable content
+35 points
Parallel coverage
58%
26 / 45 URLs · fails on 19
Median signal ratio · 45-URL benchmark

When both reach a page, TinyFish returns cleaner content: 90.5% vs 76.3% median signal ratio.

TinyFish
90.5%
vs
Parallel
76.3%

Zero news coverage.

Parallel returned zero usable results across 15 news articles from five major publishers. Every response was a truncated snippet, not a page extraction.

TinyFish15/15
Parallel0/15
The full stack

TinyFish adds interaction where Parallel stops.

Parallel's product surface is search, extract, and deep research. When your agent needs to do something on a page, not just read it, there is no Parallel API for that. TinyFish was built for the full interaction loop.

Web Agent

Navigates pages, fills forms, authenticates through login walls, and returns structured JSON. 89.9% on Mind2Web.

✓ TinyFishParallel: Not available

Stealth Browser

Raw CDP control with engine-level anti-bot protection. Reaches pages that extract-only APIs cannot.

✓ TinyFishParallel: Not available

Credential Vault

Secure authentication so your agent accesses gated content without exposing passwords.

✓ TinyFishParallel: Not available
Pricing

Search and Fetch are free.

 
TinyFish
Parallel
Search
Free
$5 / 1K requests
Fetch
Free
$1 / 1K requests
Web Agent
$0.015 / stepLLM included
Stealth Browser
$0.015 / 4 min
Free tier
500 credits + unlimited Search & Fetch
Up to 16,000 requests
Failed requests
$0

At 10K searches + 10K fetches per month, the bill speaks for itself.

TinyFish / mo
$0
vs
Parallel / mo
~$60
FAQ

Common questions.

Across 1,200 production queries, TinyFish is 3x faster at p50 (556ms vs 1,709ms) and 4x faster at p99 (1,347ms vs 5,571ms). Parallel's worst-case query takes nearly 12 seconds.

TinyFish returns usable content from 42/45 pages (93%) vs Parallel's 26/45 (58%). The gap is concentrated in news: Parallel returns 0/15 usable news results.

No. Parallel's product surface is search, extract, and deep research. When your agent needs to interact with a page, TinyFish offers a Web Agent, Stealth Browser, and Credential Vault.

TinyFish Search and Fetch are free. Parallel charges $5 per 1,000 searches and $1 per 1,000 extracts. At 10,000 searches + 10,000 fetches per month, TinyFish costs $0. Parallel costs about $60.

It gets a 600-character stub, roughly one sentence plus metadata. Your agent has no way to know the content is incomplete if the API reports success.

Search, fetch, and act in one stack.

Start freeTalk to sales