Together

Which humanoid robotics companies are really ahead?

TinySet prompt
Every humanoid robotics company, with funding, robot name and stage
tinyfish-which-humanoid-robotics-companies-are-really-ahead.csv115 rows
WebsiteCompany nameRobot nameFunding amount (USD)Funding stageFounded (year)Develops humanoid robots
https://www.1x.tech/1X TechnologiesNEOSeries B2014Yes
https://addverb.com/AddverbElixisCorporate (Reliance-owned)2016Yes
https://arobot4all.com/AEI RobotAlice9700000Series A2018Yes
https://www.agibot.com/AgiBotA2 / X286000000Pre-IPO2023Yes
https://agile-robots.com/Agile RobotsAgile ONE250000000Series C2018Yes
https://www.agilityrobotics.com/Agility RoboticsDigitSeries C2015Yes
https://ai2robotics.com/AI² RoboticsAlphaBot144000000Series B2023Yes
https://akinrobotics.com/AKINROBOTICSAKINCI-5Yes
Showing 8 of 115 rows

Then TinyResearch on the dataset:

TinyResearch prompt
Which humanoid robotics companies are genuinely ahead, and which are mostly hype?
tinyfish-which-humanoid-robotics-companies-are-really-ahead.pdf

The humanoid robotics industry is real, growing, and substantially overhyped—simultaneously. Approximately 13,000–19,000 humanoid robots shipped globally in 2025–H1 2026, but roughly 85–90% were Chinese-made, predominantly delivered to universities, research labs, and state-owned enterprises rather than productive factory floors. Among Western companies, only Agility Robotics has demonstrated the broadest verifiable record of repeated, paid commercial deployment with named customers. Figure AI completed a meaningful industrial pilot at BMW but carries a $39 billion valuation on effectively zero audited revenue. Boston Dynamics Atlas is entering production but all 2026 output is committed internally. Tesla Optimus remains an internal R&D program with serially missed targets and no external sales. UBTECH and AgiBot lead in production volume but most use cases are not industrial-productivity deployments. Physical Intelligence (π) is a pure-software play—well-funded, technically credible, pre-revenue, and not yet deployed at scale. Sanctuary AI has pivoted from humanoid hardware to selling an AI software brain for existing industrial robots, an honest strategic adjustment rather than a simple failure. The field as a whole is in what Bessemer Venture Partners calls a "GPT-2.5 moment"—past the pure demo phase, short of reliable economic deployment.

Related

Together

What is YC betting on in AI right now?

153 rows · YC has made its most aggressive, explicit pivot in its two-decade history. AI is no longer a theme within batches — it is the substrate. Roughly 95% of the Spring 2026 batch touched AI, and across 2026 batches approximately 60% of companies are explicitly AI-focused, up from ~40% in 2024. The directional shift visible in the Fall 2026 Request for Startups (RFS) — 13 categories, framed as "AI moving into the physical world" — is the clearest signal of where YC is placing chips next: physical infrastructure, defense, human-AI collaboration frameworks, and the "ownership" of intelligence rather than renting it. The December 2 Demo Day will reveal the F26 cohort fully, but early company data and the RFS together paint a sharp strategic picture right now.

Run this prompt
Together

Which LLM API gives the best value for money?

105 rows · The LLM API market in October 2026 is sharply bifurcated: a cheap tier ($0.10–$0.75/M input tokens) that now delivers capability matching premium models of 18 months ago, and a frontier tier ($4–$10/M input) for the highest-stakes agentic and reasoning work. The single most important finding is that the efficiency frontier has moved decisively: GPT-6.1 Sol at $2/$10 scores 51.8 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and Claude Sonnet 5.5 at $2/$10 scores 47–56 depending on effort level, while Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna deliver scores of roughly 28–43 at just $0.10/$0.50—a price point that was frontier-model territory less than two years ago.

Run this prompt
Together

Which AI conferences in 2027 are worth the ticket?

125 rows · The 2027 AI conference landscape divides cleanly into four categories: (1) flagship academic research conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, CVPR, AAAI, ACL, ICCV) that are peer-reviewed, selective, and best for researchers and technically senior engineers tracking the frontier; (2) applied/builder conferences (AI Engineer World's Fair, MLSys, Databricks Data+AI Summit, NVIDIA GTC) that are best for engineers shipping production AI systems; (3) commercial/executive summits (RAISE, AI Summit London, HumanX, Ai4) best for C-suite, founders, enterprise buyers, and investors; and (4) subfield-specialist venues (IROS, RSS for robotics; ACL/NAACL/EACL for NLP; CVPR/ICCV/WACV for vision; FAccT for AI ethics) that serve narrow technical communities.

Run this prompt