Compare AI laws
TinySet tracks AI laws by country and status. TinyResearch compares EU, UK and US rules for a SaaS company.
TinySet
Dataset · 50 rowsCountries with AI-specific laws passed or in progress, with law name, status and effective date
| Law name | Jurisdiction | Status | Effective date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil AI Bill (PL 2338/2023) | Brazil | bill in progress | |
| EU AI Act | European Union | in force | 2024-08-01 |
| Federal Law Regulating Artificial Intelligence | Mexico | bill in progress | |
| Peru Law No. 31814 | Peru | in force | 2023-07-05 |
| Bill C-27 | Canada | bill in progress | |
| AI Framework Act | South Korea | in force | 2026-01-22 |
| Labelling Measures | China | in force | 2025-09-01 |
| Anthropomorphic Services Measures | China | enacted, not yet effective | 2026-07-15 |
TinyResearch
ReportHow do EU, UK and US AI rules differ for a SaaS company selling into all three?
A SaaS company selling into the EU, UK, and US simultaneously faces three fundamentally different regulatory philosophies that cannot be collapsed into a single compliance program. The EU operates a comprehensive, horizontal, risk-tiered statute (the AI Act) with extraterritorial reach and hard deadlines; the UK operates a sector-led, principles-based approach with no AI-specific legislation and enforceable obligations flowing primarily from data-protection and sector-specific law; and the US operates a fragmented patchwork of state laws with no binding federal AI statute, anchored in the deregulatory posture of the current administration.
